A New Mandolin Bridge
by Peter Coombe
Recently a new mandolin bridge design has been developed by
the American musician Red Henry, together with a number of other people from
the Internet community. I was one of a number of people from the Internet
community who contributed and I thought members may be interested in the
results, hence this article. We are all grateful to Red Henry for having the
original idea, the efforts he put into developing the idea, and in sharing
it with so many other people. In my humble opinion this development is a
significant advance in mandolin bridge design. The work is still on going
and readers can gain more information about the development of this bridge
from the Net (http://www.murphymethod.com/redbridge.html). Recently Red has
reduced the foot size of the bridge and has reported tonal improvements.
This article describes my contribution to the project.
The mandolin bridge referred to in this article is the bridge used in carved
mandolins originally developed by Orville Gibson and later refined by the
company. Gibson originally used a solid Ebony bridge, which was later
refined into a two piece adjustable Ebony bridge, known as the “Loar” type
of bridge (see Fig 1A). This bridge became the standard type of bridge
used for carved top mandolins, and is still commonly used today by most
In recent years Vern Brekke from the Sound to Earth company (STE) developed
and patented a new bridge that was designed to overcome many of the short
comings of the Loar type of bridge. This bridge has gained some acceptance
amongst some players and makers (see Fig 1B). However, the Brekke bridge is
somewhat controversial, with many people preferring the sound of the Loar
bridge, others preferring the sound of the Brekke. Personally I prefer the
sound of the Brekke bridge, and use it on my own mandolins. The Brekke
bridge is specifically designed so it does not tip foreword, and the saddle
does not bow or break, which some Loar type bridges have a tendency to do.
It only has Ebony/Ebony/soundboard contact, unlike the Loar type of bridge
which has Ebony/brass/Ebony/soundboard contact. It is adjusted by two small
allen bolts from the side. To my ears it has a smoother, warmer tonal
quality over that of the Loar type bridge.
The thinking behind the new mandolin bridge is to use the principles of the
bridge to improve the sound of the mandolin. Red Henry reasoned that Maple
is used in violin bridges so why not use Maple on a mandolin. Most of the
developments of the new bridge, which I will now call the “Henry” bridge has
been done using Maple,although Red and myself, and some others have tried
other woods. Red claims to get the “best” sound quality from quarter sawn
European or American Rock Maple, but opinions are divided. My own design of
the Henry bridge is pictured in Fig 1C. I have got best results from Ebony.
In my opinion, Ebony has given me improvements in sound quality miles in
front of any other wood I have tried, including Maple.
Violin makers will immediately notice from my Henry bridge that the outside
have solid wood underneath them, unlike a violin bridge. My experiments with
Maple Henry bridges have shown that if the wings of the bridge are cut
underneath the E strings, the mandolin becomes unbalanced with the E strings
sounding somewhat “dead”. This is not so critical for the G strings. Thus
for mandolins, unlike violins, it is essential the outside strings are
supported by solid wood.
Below I have summarised the results of some trials of various Henry bridges
have made. The Myrtle and Blackwood bridges were topped with Ebony because I
found that Myrtle on it’s own was unsatisfactory. In all cases I had two
mandolins that I had made so I could use one instrument as a reference. The
reference instrument had an Ebony Brekke bridge installed. STE kindly
supplied me with a Brekke bridge made from Maple so I could compare
absolutely identical bridges of Maple and Ebony. The reference bridge was an
Ebony Brekke bridge as supplied by STE, and the comments below reflect the
differences I heard between the experimental bridge and the Ebony Brekke. My
impressions of each bridge was checked with one other person, who
consistently agreed with my conclusions. All bridges were made from quarter
sawn timber, and were as close to identical as I could manage by hand except
for bridge (7). This bridge was thinner than the others.
(1) Rock Maple Brekke bridge as supplied by STE
A small increase in volume. This bridge sounded brighter and with a thinner,
harsher tonal quality.
(2) Rock Maple
Large increase in volume, brighter and with more bite to the sound.
when playing with other instruments. Deterioration in tonal quality similar
Maple Brekke bridge - thinner and harsher tone.
(3) European Maple
Similar to (2). No perceptible change in volume from (2), but some
tone. I preferred the sound of the Rock Maple bridge.
Very good bass, poor sounding treble.
(5) Myrtle topped with Ebony. Myrtle is my favourite backwood for mandolins
so I had great hopes for this bridge. It sounded almost identical to the
bridge so was a bit of a disappointment.
(6) Blackwood topped with Ebony.
Big increase in volume. This bridge was the loudest of all the bridges I
made. Sweet and bright sound. Somewhat thin sounding bass. Promising sound,
but too bright for my ears.
Increase in volume, but not as much as the Maple or Blackwood bridges.
Smoother and sweeter tonal quality. The improvements this bridge made to the
tone of the mandolin was striking. The instrument was transformed into a
much better sounding mandolin.
(8) Ebony, thinner than (7)
Best sounding bridge. Louder and smoother tone than (7). Big improvement on
Ebony Brekke bridge. This is the bridge I installed on my own personal
mandolin (see Fig 1C) and used it for some 6 months before switching to a
modified Brekke (see below).
The Henry bridge does have quite a profound effect on the sound of the
mandolin and can improve both volume and tone considerably. The difference
obvious and is not subtle. To a player it is like playing your familiar
mandolin, but it sounds like a completely different instrument. My own
investigations have indicated the traditional Ebony has given me by far the
best tone, but most of the experiments by others (including Red Henry) into
this new bridge design has used Maple. Opinion is divided about whether
Maple or Ebony is the best material to make the bridges from. Bluegrass
players appreciate the extra bite and volume of Maple, whereas other
players, such as myself, don’t like the thinner and harsher tone of Maple.
The bridge can be tailored to the individual instrument, similar to how
violin bridges can be adjusted by changing the wings, and the mass of the
bridge. My experiments have indicated as a rough approximation that lighter
bridges give a louder and brighter sound. The wings also increase volume and
To understand why the Henry bridge has such a large effect on the sound of a
mandolin, one needs to examine some of the research on violin bridges (see
Fletcher and Rossing, The Physics of Musical Instruments for a summary) .
Violin bridges have two main resonant modes. One is an up and down motion,
the other is a twisting motion. Drilling holes in the centre of the bridge
will increase flexibility and should enhance the up and down motion. Adding
wings will increase the twisting motion. Indeed, a Henry bridge built
with asymmetric wings is not as effective as a symmetric bridge which is
what would be expected if the bridge was undergoing a twisting motion.
The disadvantage of the Henry bridge is that it is not adjustable like the
Loar style of bridge or the Brekke bridge. The bridge needs to be made
specifically for a particular instrument, and putting the mandolin in a dry
environment, or fret wear can cause buzzing which can only be solved by
making another higher bridge, or in the case of fret wear, a refret or fret
dressing. Also, brand new mandolins tend to settle a little over their first
few months of life, so a non adjustable bridge becomes impractical for
someone such as myself who exports instruments overseas. An additional
problem is that different musicians prefer a different height of action, and
often customers cannot tell me exactly how high or how low they prefer their
mandolin to be set up. A non adjustable bridge will fix the action
permanently so an adjustable bridge is a big advantage. Can we apply some of
the techniques learned from the Henry bridge to an adjustable bridge? The
Loar type of bridge is not suitable because drilling holes in the saddle
will almost certainly cause the saddle to bend or break. I therefore decided
to try to improve the sound of the Brekke bridge, once again by using an
identical reference mandolin with a standard Brekke, and changing a Brekke
bridge on my own instrument.
There is not much I could do about adding wings to the Brekke bridge because
of the design, but there are other things that can be done to reduce mass
flexibility. First experiment was to thin the bridge base down to 1/4” at
the base and tapering to as thin as I dared so the bridge is wedge shaped.
The shape then is similar to my Henry bridges. This is a fairly low risk
modification since the base of the Brekke bridge is very stiff and strong.
This modification produced a noticeable increase in volume and the mandolin
became more resonant and responsive. Not nearly as much as the Ebony Henry
bridge, but still significant and well worth while. The next experiment was
to drill two holes in the centre of the saddle and to join them with a cut
similar to how I made the Henry bridges (see Fig 2). This will weaken the
saddle significantly so does involve some degree of risk. Fortunately the
Brekke saddle is strong enough such that the saddles I have modified so far
have not collapsed or sagged. This modification produces quite a significant
improvement in the tone of the mandolin, particularly in the treble. All in
all these two modifications removed just under 3gm from the weight of the
original Brekke bridge. The next experiment was to take the original Brekke
Bridge I used as the reference, modify it and compare it to the Ebony Henry
bridge. Much to my surprise, I preferred the sound of the modified Brekke.
Volume was about the same, but I thought the modified Brekke had a sweeter
In future all my mandolins will be delivered with the modified Brekke
way the customer gets an adjustable commercial bridge with the sonic
improvements of the Henry bridge. Thank you Red Henry, and thanks to the
members of the Internet community who contributed